Helen Michaels: The Decision
Keywords:
tenure decisions, all-or-nothing nature, uneven teaching evaluations, case study, good enough teacher, high standardsAbstract
Tenure decisions in academia are critical, due to the all-or-nothing nature of the tenure system. A faculty member who is granted tenure by a university has maximum job security at that institution; one who is denied tenure is basically dismissed from that position, given one additional year of employment (the so-called terminal year) to search for employment elsewhere.
This important situation becomes more complex when the decision is not clear-cut. This was the case with the tenure decision involving Helen Michaels, assistant professor of accounting at Atlantic Southern University. Michaels was generally liked and respected by colleagues and students, and was known as a hard worker, someone who would step up and take on unpleasant tasks for the overall betterment of the business school. However, Michaels also had some uneven teaching evaluations, and had not produced research in the quality or quantity of most of her colleagues. Michaels’ departmental review committee (DRC) had already voted to deny tenure, and a similar recommendation by the dean of the business school would end Michaels’ quest for tenure. The dean’s decision comes down to this: should the school grant tenure to a faculty member who is “pretty good,” or dismiss the individual and search for someone better, no guarantee in a discipline such as accounting, where applicants are in shorter supply due to attractive options outside of academia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Authors Retain Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).